[#CV-0175] State Of San Andreas V. Donnie Siegel

[Thomas Buckley]

State of San Andreas v. Donnie Siegel

---

I. Opening Statement

Your honor,
On the 21st of May, 2026, the Detective Bureau received a report regarding officers allegedly finishing a suspect during an incident. Due to the severity of the allegations, an official investigation was initiated by the Detective Bureau.
Following the opening of the investigation, Trainee Detective Thomas Buckley was officially assigned to the case for investigative review and evidence analysis under the authority of the Detective Bureau Command.
Detective Mysha secured the involved officer’s bodycam footage and later placed the device on the investigation table for review. I subsequently retrieved the bodycam and reviewed the footage through the Detective Bureau computer system.
During the review of the footage, Officer Donnie Siegel was observed soliciting Officer Bob Boulevard to commit criminal acts connected to the unlawful killing of the suspect. The footage additionally showed clear abuse of police authority, misconduct under color of law, and actions inconsistent with lawful police procedures and departmental policy.
The investigation further determined that the involved officers acted outside the scope of their lawful authority while attempting to handle the incident and involved individuals present at the scene. Statements and conduct observed during the footage review indicated consciousness of guilt and attempts to avoid accountability for the incident under investigation.

---

II. Charges
SA-PSC § III.1. Corruption and misuse of public office
The defendant abused his authority as a sworn law enforcement officer and acted outside lawful police procedures while on duty.
SA-PSC § II.15. Attempted Murder
The defendant, Donnie Siegel, intentionally used deadly force against an individual with the apparent intent to cause death or serious bodily harm.
SA-PSC § VIII.2. Soliciting
The defendant encouraged and participated in unlawful conduct connected to the incident involving other individuals.

---

III. Evidence

Exhibit A: Footage

Spoiler

Exhibit B: Bodycam Footage review

Reviewing

Damage log

21-05-2026 00:22:55 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160) -> Harry_Wolfe (46)(620) [MP5] [left arm] [8.25xp] [Victim wep: fist] [Victim location] [Issuer location]
21-05-2026 00:22:55 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160) -> Harry_Wolfe (46)(620) [MP5] [torso] [8.25xp] [Victim wep: fist] [Victim location] [Issuer location]
21-05-2026 00:22:55 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160) -> Harry_Wolfe (46)(620) [MP5] [torso] [8.25xp] [Victim wep: fist] [Victim location] [Issuer location]
21-05-2026 00:22:55 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160) -> Harry_Wolfe (46)(620) [MP5] [torso] [8.25xp] [Victim wep: fist] [Victim location] [Issuer location]
21-05-2026 00:22:55 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160) -> Harry_Wolfe (46)(620) [MP5] [torso] [8.25xp] [Victim wep: fist] [Victim location] [Issuer location]
21-05-2026 00:22:55 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160) -> Harry_Wolfe (46)(620) [MP5] [torso] [8.25xp] [Victim wep: fist] [Victim location] [Issuer location]
21-05-2026 00:22:55 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160) -> Harry_Wolfe (46)(620) [MP5] [torso] [8.25xp] [Victim wep: fist] [Victim location] [Issuer location

Chatlog

Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /u Don't in front of people.
21-05-2026 00:26:18 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /u Hopefully he didn't record.
21-05-2026 00:26:26 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /u Ignore him.
21-05-2026 00:26:46 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /l Haha.
21-05-2026 00:27:03 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /l Yes
21-05-2026 00:27:07 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /l Hi.
21-05-2026 00:27:21 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /l We just killed his _Wolfe friends, and he came in scene.
21-05-2026 00:27:30 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /l
21-05-2026 00:27:35 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /t
21-05-2026 00:27:38 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /L Now he acts like innocent.
21-05-2026 00:27:45 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /seize 8
21-05-2026 00:28:35 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /groupmembers sapd
21-05-2026 00:28:45 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /pm 19 They fucking hear /u?
21-05-2026 00:29:06 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /pm 19 When I texted ''Hopefully he didn't record it'' - he said ''Yes I did''
21-05-2026 00:29:10 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /drag 8
21-05-2026 00:29:18 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /gate
21-05-2026 00:29:28 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /su 8
21-05-2026 00:29:46 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /su 8 failure to obey
21-05-2026 00:29:47 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /jail 8
21-05-2026 00:29:50 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /gate
21-05-2026 00:29:58 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /u I think they can hear.
21-05-2026 00:30:14 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /rack
21-05-2026 00:30:25 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /l Where
21-05-2026 00:31:17 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /groupmembers sapd
21-05-2026 00:31:32 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /gps 1882
21-05-2026 00:32:09 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /l Damn.
21-05-2026 00:32:26 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /m
21-05-2026 00:32:27 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /mdc
21-05-2026 00:32:40 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /rlow He might not be a suspect.
- Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /rlow Ask to unmask.
21-05-2026 00:20:07 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): I know.
21-05-2026 00:20:15 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Yeah, I used to have some issues with him before.
21-05-2026 00:24:04 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): This is the SAN ANDREAS POLICE - SURRENDER!
21-05-2026 00:24:21 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Hands!
21-05-2026 00:24:33 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Cut OOC.
21-05-2026 00:25:09 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): You came to assist your friends, eh?
21-05-2026 00:26:46 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Haha.
21-05-2026 00:27:03 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Yes
21-05-2026 00:27:07 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Hi.
21-05-2026 00:27:21 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): We just killed his _Wolfe friends, and he came in scene.
21-05-2026 00:27:38 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Now he acts like innocent.
21-05-2026 00:30:25 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Where
21-05-2026 00:32:09 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Damn.
21-05-2026 00:33:26 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): He's fucking lagging.
21-05-2026 00:33:28 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Mobiler.
21-05-2026 00:34:05 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Fucking hell.
21-05-2026 00:34:39 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Yeah it's him.
21-05-2026 00:34:45 - [megaphone] Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Just unmask and you will be fine.

Exhibit C: Processings

Processings

[19:21:30] * Mysha Basundhara takes out a DLSR Camera
[19:21:50] Mysha Basundhara says: Look at right
[19:22:02] Mysha Basundhara says: Look at your right mate
[19:22:05] Mysha Basundhara says: Like this
[19:22:14] Mysha Basundhara says: Full body , Not just head
[19:22:42] Mysha Basundhara says: Other side
[19:22:59] Mysha Basundhara says: You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of..
[19:22:59] Mysha Basundhara says: You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford one, one will be provided for you.
[19:22:59] Mysha Basundhara says: Do you understand these rights?
[19:23:03] Donnie Siegel says: I do.
[19:23:13] * Mysha Basundhara moves her right arm as she takes out her pair of latex gloves and wears it.
[19:23:17] * Mysha Basundhara searches Donnie Siegel for weapons and items.
[19:23:26] Mysha Basundhara says: You are under arrest for
[19:23:32] Mysha Basundhara says: Solicitation
[19:23:36] Mysha Basundhara says: Corruption and misuse of public office*** [F
[19:23:39] Mysha Basundhara says: Murder
[19:23:55] * Mysha Basundhara takes out a cotton swab and latex gloves and walks to donnie
[19:23:56] Donnie Siegel says: Could you explain each of that, when did it happen and how?
[19:24:02] Mysha Basundhara says: We will
[19:24:05] Mysha Basundhara says: Open your mouth
[19:24:07] Mysha Basundhara says: say aaa
[19:24:55] * Mysha Basundhara moves her right arm as she swabs the cotton swab on his mouth and puts it on the evidence bag
[19:24:56] * seals it (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:25:03] * Mysha Basundhara searches Donnie Siegel for weapons and items.
[19:25:07] Mysha Basundhara says: Come with us
[19:25:33] Mysha Basundhara says: stnad here
[19:25:38] Mysha Basundhara says: like this
[19:25:47] * Mysha Basundhara turns on the fingerprint machine
[19:25:57] * Mysha Basundhara puts the suspect right arm on the fingerprint machine and scanning it
[19:26:00] * scanning 1/3 (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:26:02] * scanning 2/3 (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:26:03] * scanning 3/3 (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:26:17] * Mysha Basundhara puts the suspect left arm on the finerprint machine and scanning it
[19:26:23] * Scanning 1/3 (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:26:25] * Scanning 2/3 (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:26:27] * Scanning 3/3 (Mysha Basundhara)

interrogation

[19:27:52] * Mysha Basundhara moves her right arm as she turns on the audio recorder and faces the Camera on Donnie and turns it on
[19:28:11] * Its recording audio and clear video of Donnie (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:29:06] Mysha Basundhara says: Detective I Mysha S.Basundhara Starting This Interogattion at 15:28 CET on Donnie Siegel For..
[19:29:13] Mysha Basundhara says: Corruption and misuse of public office*** [F
[19:29:16] Mysha Basundhara says: Murder
[19:29:20] Mysha Basundhara says: Alright so
[19:29:21] Mysha Basundhara says: You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of..
[19:29:21] Mysha Basundhara says: You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford one, one will be provided for you.
[19:29:21] Mysha Basundhara says: Do you understand these rights?
[19:29:25] Donnie Siegel says: Yes I do.
[19:29:58] Mysha Basundhara says: So mr Siegel
[19:30:10] Mysha Basundhara says: Do you understand the charges that are put on you
[19:30:18] Donnie Siegel says: Absolutely not.
[19:30:29] Donnie Siegel says: I believe I am wrongfully in this place, maybe you're looking for someone else.
[19:30:40] Mysha Basundhara says: Do you know about the situation 2days ago, Behind market ammunation?
[19:30:55] Donnie Siegel says: Not really, doesn't ring a bell. What else can you remind me?
[19:31:06] Mysha Basundhara says: Really
[19:31:14] Mysha Basundhara says: With someone called Bob?
[19:31:27] Donnie Siegel says: Yes, he's a recruit officer.
[19:31:45] Mysha Basundhara says: So , Dont u remember what u did with him?
[19:31:58] Donnie Siegel says: Nope. What did I do?
[19:32:25] Mysha Basundhara says: Requirt Officer Killed a person maybe suspect infront of u , Who was in cuffs
[19:32:45] Mysha Basundhara says: You didn't stop him or report him. You go by him. Helped him
[19:32:49] Mysha Basundhara says: Why
[19:33:03] Donnie Siegel says: Yes you are right. He killed a knocked suspect.
[19:33:24] Donnie Siegel says: You are I did not report him yes, but stop? How do I stop him?
[19:33:34] Donnie Siegel says: Actually yes, I told him, why did he do that.
[19:33:36] Mysha Basundhara says: By tasing him? By telling supervisior
[19:33:49] Donnie Siegel says: Nope I did not do that, but I immediately told him why he shot the suspect.
[19:34:07] Donnie Siegel says: Helped him? No. How did I help him?
[19:34:07] * Mysha Basundhara moves her riht arm as she takes out a SAPD provided laptop and clicks on a video on it.
[19:34:33] Mysha Basundhara says: Take a look at this Mr.Siegel
[19:34:45] * what would I see? (Donnie Siegel)
[19:34:51] * Mysha Basundhara turns around the laptop as she click on the video play and show it to donnie
[19:35:10] * 21-05-2026 00:27:38 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Now he acts like innocent. (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:35:40] * 21-05-2026 00:26:18 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /u Hopefully he didn't record. (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:35:45] Mysha Basundhara says: Explain this Mr.Siegel
[19:35:52] Mysha Basundhara says: Hope , He didn't record it?
[19:36:07] Mysha Basundhara says: Hope he didnt record it , Hmm...
[19:36:09] * The first two sentences are completely wrong from your side. I was talking to an administrator. (Donnie Siegel)
[19:36:34] * No its from /u (Unit Chat) (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:36:40] * The two sentences are not. (Donnie Siegel)
[19:36:54] * I was talking to an admin, dig into logs and you'll confirm. (Donnie Siegel)
[19:37:13] * That was /b or /l, if it was /u, it would show, like the third sentence. (Donnie Siegel)
[19:37:27] * The provided ones are Local chat and Unit Chat. (None is ooc) (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:37:29] Mysha Basundhara says: So explain this
[19:37:50] * I was talking to admin, in the first two sentences you provided. It was OOC. (Donnie Siegel)
[19:37:58] * Admin sit, after I had reported someone from that sit. (Donnie Siegel)
[19:38:16] * Just beacuse I said ''killed them'', doesn't mean I am wrong. (Donnie Siegel)
[19:38:18] * I just expressed it like that, doesn't mean that I did something wrong. (Donnie Siegel)
[19:38:24] * That was OOC, yes. (Donnie Siegel)
[19:38:26] * 21-05-2026 00:27:38 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): /L Now he acts like innocent. (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:38:27] * I was talking to an admin there. (Donnie Siegel)
[19:38:30] * Thats not OOC that /l (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:38:41] * Are you listening to me or not? It was admin sit, I was talking to him. (Donnie Siegel)
[19:40:06] * Mysha Basundhara turns around the laptop and closes it
[19:40:35] Donnie Siegel says: Why don't you show the sentences where I say ''don't kill knocked suspects''?
[19:40:40] Mysha Basundhara says: Explain , Mr.Siegel.
[19:40:42] Donnie Siegel says: But only the ones you want?
[19:40:47] Donnie Siegel says: The ones you don't like, you show them to me.
[19:40:49] Mysha Basundhara says: Why you did not arrest him , Did not report him
[19:41:06] Donnie Siegel says: I told him already, not to kill knocked people.
[19:41:09] Mysha Basundhara says: Do you think we are joking with you Mr Siegel? Its a serious situation here.
[19:41:21] Donnie Siegel says: Do I look like I'm kidding around here?
[19:41:24] Mysha Basundhara says: So you think , Hey u took a life , No problem dont take from next time?
[19:41:45] Donnie Siegel says: Yes that is my only mistake. I should have reported.
[19:41:45] Mysha Basundhara says: Or you follow PD Regulations and STOP him report him At that moment, SAVE the suspect instead of..
[19:41:50] Donnie Siegel says: But, I told him, not to kill people like that.
[19:42:08] Donnie Siegel says: Save the suspect? He's dead. What the hell are you talking about?
[19:42:10] Mysha Basundhara says: Only mistake? Mr.Siegel , You know what that mistake is called
[19:42:14] Donnie Siegel says: What do I do, get in front of the gun, stop the bullet?
[19:42:19] Mysha Basundhara says: That mistake is called Solicitation Mr Siegel
[19:42:31] Donnie Siegel says: You do not even know what ''Solicitation'' means.
[19:42:39] Mysha Basundhara says: What a irony
[19:42:44] Donnie Siegel says: You're adding charges on me while I did not do it.
[19:42:54] Mysha Basundhara says: You did not do?
[19:42:56] Donnie Siegel says: Solicitation is when you urge someone to do something.
[19:43:04] Donnie Siegel says: What did I tell Bob to do? Kill the suspect?
[19:43:18] Mysha Basundhara says: So you are telling me you did not helped him? You did not support him? You shouldve taken Bob into..
[19:43:25] Mysha Basundhara says: You should take the suspect to Jail.
[19:43:46] Mysha Basundhara says: You should've taken him to proper justice , Instead you choose to support your fellow recuirt. No..
[19:43:46] Donnie Siegel says: It was impossible, the suspect was dead, revive was offered.
[19:43:48] Mysha Basundhara says: Take a fellow life
[19:43:55] Donnie Siegel says: Listen-listen, he was dead, we offered revive.
[19:43:56] Donnie Siegel says: Okay?
[19:44:20] Donnie Siegel says: Out of nowhere, Bob's head starts thinking crazy thinks, and boom. Gun out, shoot the suspect.
[19:44:21] Mysha Basundhara says: You could've stop your requirt. We have dascamera footage that you were still standing behind suspect..
[19:44:23] Donnie Siegel says: What do I do?
[19:44:29] Mysha Basundhara says: behind market ammunation
[19:44:43] Mysha Basundhara says: It was not sudden mr Siegel. We have proof (Screenshot)
[19:44:48] Donnie Siegel says: What do you mean? I don't understand you.
[19:44:56] Donnie Siegel says: You're saying I ordered Bob to kill the suspect?
[19:45:06] Mysha Basundhara says: We man that , You tried to save your fellow recuirt. You tried to save Bob.
[19:45:20] Mysha Basundhara says: even if you reported him or arrested him that moment to supervisior. You would be in no harm
[19:45:26] Mysha Basundhara says: But you decide to keep secret
[19:45:37] Mysha Basundhara says: Do you deny it
[19:45:38] Donnie Siegel says: As I said, that's my only mistake. For not reporting him.
[19:45:46] Donnie Siegel says: Now, why am I charged for murder? Who did I kill?
[19:45:59] Mysha Basundhara says: A mistake huh. Two days , still not reported to supervisior
[19:46:03] Donnie Siegel says: Solicitation? What did I tell to Bob? Did I order him to murder the suspect?
[19:46:22] Mysha Basundhara says: You have supported him.
[19:46:55] Donnie Siegel says: Are you listening to me?
[19:46:55] Donnie Siegel says: Now, why am I charged for murder? Who did I kill?
[19:46:55] Donnie Siegel says: Solicitation? What did I tell to Bob? Did I order him to murder the suspect?
[19:46:55] Donnie Siegel says: Explain the added charges.
[19:46:58] Donnie Siegel says: Solicitation, oh god. You don't even know what that is.
[19:47:10] Donnie Siegel says: Just explain, I'm glad to hear it from you.
[19:47:12] * Mysha Basundhara moves her right arm as she turns on the laptop and faces it to Donnie
[19:47:15] * Plays a video (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:47:22] * 21-05-2026 00:20:15 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Yeah, I used to have some issues with him before. (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:47:34] ..( (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:47:41] * 21-05-2026 00:26:46 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Haha. (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:47:54] Mysha Basundhara says: Explain this
[19:48:00] Mysha Basundhara says: What you meant by you killed his friends?
[19:48:14] * Mysha Basundhara turns the laptop to her and closes it
[19:48:59] Mysha Basundhara says: Put a hand on your chest , Don't you think you did something wrong?
[19:49:22] Mysha Basundhara says: Or you still thinkin' you did a correct thing?
[19:49:27] Donnie Siegel says: You're still ignoring me, I believe you really do not know what ''Solicitation'' is.
[19:49:39] Donnie Siegel says: I am asking for the third time, where do you see Solicitation and Murder from me there?
[19:49:45] Mysha Basundhara says: And you are avoiding my question too.
[19:49:51] Donnie Siegel says: I have answered everything.
[19:49:55] Donnie Siegel says: Time for you to answer, I am asking for my rights.
[19:49:58] Donnie Siegel says: I am asking for the third time, where do you see Solicitation and Murder from me there?
[19:50:21] Mysha Basundhara says: You have assist'ed your requirt. Helping him to commit the murder.
[19:50:29] * Mysha Basundhara sighs.
[19:51:13] Donnie Siegel says: Yes. I accept the fact that I am wrong for not reporting him to the supervisory staff.
[19:51:15] Donnie Siegel says: I hided the crime he did.
[19:51:22] Donnie Siegel says: But, charged for murder?
[19:51:25] Donnie Siegel says: I did kill nobody.
[19:51:28] * Mysha Basundhara nods.
[19:51:38] Donnie Siegel says: That's a false charge added on me.
[19:51:43] Mysha Basundhara says: You helped him. i guess its the court who will decide.
[19:52:00] Mysha Basundhara says: i will give you a paper. Its your choice if accept it or not.
[19:52:02] * Mysha Basundhara moves her right arm as she takes out a confession paper from the desk and hands it over to the person
[19:52:10] Donnie Siegel says: I didn't help him, I did not give him bullets for the weapon.
[19:52:14] Donnie Siegel says: I don't know what you call ''help''.
[19:52:31] Donnie Siegel says: Murder is wrongfully added as a charge on me.
[19:52:37] Donnie Siegel says: So is solicitation.
[19:53:05] * I, <FirsI Donnie Siegel, confess to the charges of Solicitation, committed on 22/5/26, at Market. (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:53:16] Mysha Basundhara says: its your choice if u sign it or no.
[19:53:24] * does not sign the paper. (Donnie Siegel)
[19:53:30] * Mysha Basundhara sighs.
[19:53:33] Mysha Basundhara says: Very well.
[19:53:47] * Mysha Basundhara takes the confession paper and puts it back.
[19:54:20] Mysha Basundhara says: Detective I Mysha Basundhara Colclduing this interogattion at 15:54 CET
[19:54:31] * Mysha Basundhara turns off the audio and video recorder.
[19:54:48] * Mysha Basundhara offs the cuffs from the table and puts it on his arms again
[19:55:59] Mysha Basundhara says: Walk with us Mr.Siegel
[19:57:07] Mysha Basundhara says: Come with us
[19:57:15] * Mysha Basundhara opens the gate.
[19:57:17] * Mysha Basundhara closes the gate.
[19:58:16] Mysha Basundhara says: face the cell mate
[19:59:03] * Mysha Basundhara puts the suspect inside holding cells
[19:59:15] * You will be provided with a new set of clothes and all personal belongings will be confiscated. (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:59:21] * While in holding cells, you may not influence any ongoing situation in any way. (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:59:27] * You are not allowed to access, load, or store items from vehicles, properties, or any external storage. (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:59:32] * You must wait for further processing, interrogation, release, or transfer to jail. (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:59:35] * When you are called to continue the situation, you must respond. (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:59:39] * Do you understand these rules? (Mysha Basundhara)
[19:59:47] * For how long will I be into holding cells? (Donnie Siegel)
[20:00:10] * 14days , If any outcome dosnt come in 14days its invalid (Mysha Basundhara)

MDC

Exhibit D: Uploading Footage of Bodycam in SAPD cloud

Spoiler

---

IV. Demands

The Prosecution respectfully submits the following sentencing recommendations to the Court:

1: Asset Forfeiture

Seizure of assets up to 5,000,000$.

2: Custodial Sentence

A term of 20 years imprisonment to be served in a State Penitentiary.

---

V. Settlement Offer

In the interest of judicial economy and to avoid unnecessary court proceedings, the Prosecution extends the following plea agreement:

Terms for the Defendant

The defendant must enter a formal guilty plea to the charges presented and waive the right to a full trial.

Offer by the State

Upon acceptance of the above terms, the State agrees to reduce the custodial sentence from 20 years to 15 years imprisonment and reduce asset forfeiture from $4,000,000 to $2,000,000.

Conditions of Validity

It shall remain valid only if accepted prior to the commencement of trial proceedings.

Failure to accept will result in the State pursuing full penalties without reduction.

---

---

Signed,

Nan Ting
Thomas Buckley
State Prosecution
[email protected]

[Donnie Siegel]

(( Any judge taking this over? ))

[Marcus Fernandes]

State of San Andreas
First Judicial District Court
United States Courthouse
3321 Downtown Avenue, Los Santos, San Andreas

---

State of San Andreas
v.
Donnie Siegel

CASE # CV-175
HONORABLE TRIAL JUDGE PRESIDING:
Marcus Fernandes

*Hon. Trial Judge Marcus Fernandes enters the Court room, people will stand if seated, he takes a seat followed by the rest of the people in the court room. He then grabs from his pocket a glasses case, opens it and takes his glasses out & then puts them on. He proceeds to grab the case file in front of him.*

*Hon. Trial Judge Marcus Fernandes starts looking at the case carefully and proceeds with the following;*

The First Judicial District Court recognises this Criminal Lawsuit as submitted by the Prosecutor Police Detective I Thomas Buckley on behalf of the San Andreas State Police, henceforth the Plaintiff. The evidence provided in the initial documentation provided by the state prosecution against Mr. Donnie Siegel, henceforth the Defendant, is deemed as sufficient and removes possibility for summary dismissal. Let it be recognised that the court has assigned this case ID # CV-175.

To the Defendant:
You have forty-eight (48) hours to confirm whether you will be represented by a legal counsel or intend to defend yourself in this case. If you have hired legal counsel, please have them reply to this court communique with their details. Failure to confirm these details within the 48 hour window will result in this court issuing a summons for your appearance. Failure to appear before this court does not invalidate this case and we will proceed without you if we need to.

(( Please forum PM me if there's a particular reason as to why this timeframe is unreasonable ))

• The Court allows you to plea for the settlement offer if you wish to do so, otherwise, you refuse the offer & proceed to go for trial.

To the Plaintiff:
You have the next 48 hours to provide this court with a witness list that you intend to call upon.

(( Please forum PM me with any supporting evidence that confirms the IC validity of your evidence or any additional evidence ))

Signed,

[Donnie Siegel]

I.

DEFENSE STATEMENT

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I, Donnie Siegel, will be representing myself in this case.

Your Honor,

I will be starting off by explaning what really happened on the day of May 21st, 2026.

During my patrol with Officer Bob Boulevard, we were chasing two suspects. The suspects headed towards Market, specifically in the sewers, outside the Black Market entrance. Upon arrival, both suspects exited their vehicle and opened fire towards me & Officer Bob. Our life was put in danger, so we returned fire. After fire was exchanged, the suspects ran inside the Black Market. Immediately, we also rushed inside and as soon as we entered, we managed to take them down. We approached them and continued with the procedures of securing both of the suspects, such as cuffing, offering medical assistance, frisking & seizing. After medical assistance was provided to both suspects, only one managed to make it out alive, while the other one couldn't. When we had just exited the market and were securing the suspect inside the cruiser, unexpectedly, a random civillian comes nearby and instantly opens fire against me & Officer Bob. Once again, our life was put in danger and without the use of the deadly force, we couldn't make it out alive. The civillian that appeared to be shooting us outside the market came in help of his friend and attempted to assist him in escaping, with it not being possible and resulting into negative consequences. He also loses his life, although we tried our best to keep him alive. Meanwhile I was about enter the cruiser and leave from the scene to transport the secured suspect to the State Prison, Officer Bob decides to do something completely unnecessary, by shooting the knocked suspect, that had already lost his life due to the severe gunshot wounds. Under no circumstances I encouraged, instructed, urged, supported or pushed Officer Bob into doing the act. Officer Bob acted entirely on his own initiative, his decision was made independently. Meanwhile, the reporter of this incident had arrived in the scene and witnessed Officer Bob's act which he later reported to the authorities.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

II. CLARIFICATION ON THE ADDED CHARGES


I. SA-PSC § III.1. Corruption and misuse of public office

• For the prosecution to prove corruption or misuse of public office, they must show that I knowingly abused my position for personal benefit. I did not receive any benefit, reward, advantage, or favor. Nor did I use my position to help Officer Bob gain anything. The evidence presented does not establish any of those elements. Not reporting my colleague's misconduct is not corruption, it's a failure of doing your duty job properly. That falls under a completely different rule: SA-PSC § III.32, Negligence in Public Office. And that is a misdemeanor. I did not try to hide Bob's act, I simply did not report it and for that I have openly admitted my mistake during the interrogation. I made a procedural mistake and I am not coming up with excuses but instead I am admitting and owning up to it. Something else I would like to mention is about speaking of my inventory. As I was being detained and frisked by the detectives, I came out very clean with the carrying items I had with me, something that prosecution did not bother to show or mention, of course beacuse it was not in their favor. Most of the times when a police officer gets detained in cases like those, they're found carrying illegal substances. A corrupt officer wouldn't do all of that so I genuinely have surprised them here. So, the prosecution is overreaching here, this charge is completely wrong, if they have to charge me here, it should be under § III.32. The corruption charge makes no sense based on the evidence provided and it should be dismissed.

II. SA-PSC § II.15. Attempted Murder

• This charge makes me raise a question to the prosecution because the prosecution itself appears to have changed the charge. During interrogation, I was informed that I was charged for Murder. Now in court, that charge has apparently become Attempted Murder. I would like the prosecution to give an explanation for this. If they initially believed a murder occurred, what caused them to abandon that charge? And if they now believe attempted murder occurred, with what evidence is the prosecution going to back up their charge against me? Excuse me but who did I attempt to murder? You do not add charges based on radio transcripts. (Miles was not present when gunshots exchanged, only witnssed Bob's act. So, you can't dig into admin logs and take them as evidence. More is explained in the off-topic below.) The prosecution has literally provided zero evidence to validate this charge. Nobody else was present when shots were fired inside the market, only me, Officer Bob and the suspect. The prosecution is based on the radio transcripts for this charge, but they have zero knowledge of what really happened in reality. I fully defend myself here, because this charge is added wrongfully. Just because I shot one of the suspects while he was holding no weapon, it does not mean that I have attempted to murder him. In fact, he had just opened fire on me outside the market and after entering inside, I managed to shoot him down. The suspect not less than ten seconds away had provided imminent threat towards me. So as a police officer here, I have the right to shoot as I have to defend myself against a suspect who attempted murder on me and my colleague. In no way, I attempted to murder someone innocent. In this situation I have only faced three criminals that attempted murder on me & Officer Bob. So, I have used deadly-force only when I was being threatened for life, not to harm anyone innocent. If the police in general would charge people based on radio transcripts, I guess nobody would be walking free. Without any proper evidence that shows me as a police officer attempting murder, this charge should be dropped.

III. SA-PSC § VIII.2. Soliciting

• The solicitation charge is unsupported by the evidence. I wonder if the prosecution even knows what ''soliciting'' means and where they find the courage to accuse me for this reason. I was left speechless when I heard about this charge. Detectives should come more prepared when executing a arrest warrant, during the interrogation the female detective showed her unprofessionalism and lack of knowledge. Now to proceed with this charge, I want to start off by explaning this charge, as the proescution itself might not know what it does mean. Solicitation is when X person encourages, urges, commands or supports person Y to commit a crime. Sorry but I have not encouraged or urged Bob to do the act. Speculation, assumptions, or guilt by association are not evidence. Being present when another officer commits misconduct does not transform me into the person who solicited it. The act was made independently and was completely unexpected. I was stunned and wondered why would he would do it. In the evidence given by the prosecution, you can notice that I am telling him not to do such act and he replies with: ''Why?''. I wonder how do you accuse me of solicitation with no specific evidence at all. I will kindly accept the charge with open arms and be willing to face its consequences if the prosecution shows me just one single evidence of me urging or ordering Officer Bob to do the act. If the prosecution shows me any sentence of me urging or encouraging Bob to do the act, it would be nonsense to continue this discussion, as I would be ashamed of myself to be in front of this court again. Once again, being alongside an officer who commits a crime does not mean that I have encouraged or told him to do the act. The prosecution is misinterpreting here. I did not participate in any unlawful conduct, as I said I have nothing to do with Bob's act. It is really a shame how an authority like the Detective Bureau is throwing false accusations on a police officer like me. Everyday I have given my best for the state, so will I continue to do. It would be a disgrace for me to be punished by some amateur investigators, who have just passed their examination to achieve the first rank and that make court cases as trainee detective. The commanding officer who leads this team is the one to be judged here, because the unprofessionalism in this team can be seen very clearly. You do not let a trainee detective investigate a case like this and then, allow him to make a court case. He has just been accepted, he should be learning other things, rather than making court cases. No wonder why the prosecution lacks evidence and most importantly, opens a court case based on allegations. Somehow this trainee detective, finds the courage to open a court case against me and at all costs, find a way to ruin my reputation by making me look bad in public, penalize me from my duty job, throw fake charges on me, attempting to get me guilty for something I did not commit and get me behind the cells. I would also like to mention that this inept trainee detective who has opened this case against me not long ago was rejected from being part of the San Andreas Police Department for negative evaluation, so I can imagine what he has done. By no means, I have never had any intention of breaking the law, live under corruption or harm any citizen. Throughout my career as a police officer, I have served with pride & honor. So, if I would have done such things, I would have simply admitted, just like I did for not reporting Bob's act to the supervisory. I cannot hold someone's mistake on my arms. So again I see another accuse without evidence, therefore the charge of Soliciting should be dismissed in its entirety.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

III. SUMMARIZATION & CONCLUSION

So here I am, giving responsibility for Bob's actions. I would like to ask the prosecution, have you taken any action against Bob for his act? Maybe you've discharged him from his duty job, is that all? Why am I being the one accused here and not him? Why do I have to be judged for his actions and just because I was present, doesn't mean I am guilty or supported him in his act. Once again, I did not attempt to murder anyone. I did not order, encourage or urge Bob to do the act. He decided to do it on his own. In the evidence given by the prosecution, I immediately told him about the mistake he committed and he can be seen asking me: ''Why?''. So, in a sort of way, I believe he did not do it intentionally. Anyway, I am here to defend myself and not him, though I am here for his actions. The prosecution in this case against me is lacking evidence based on the charges they have thrown towards me, accusing me in this kind of way is unacceptable.
So, I come to these three main conclusions:

• For the corruption charge - the prosecution has failed to show any personal gain, abuse of authority, or corrupt intent from me.

• For the attempted murder charge - I did not fire towards any innocent citizen & did not assist in the shooting. The prosecution has failed to prove intent, participation, or any act committed by me that would constitute attempted murder.

• For the solicitation charge - the prosecution has not presented a single piece of evidence showing that I ordered, encouraged, requested, or persuaded Officer Bob to commit the act. Without evidence, the charge is based entirely on assumption and cannot stand.

So, once again. I have consistently accepted responsibility for the one mistake I actually made: failing to report Officer Bob's misconduct to a supervisor. I admitted that voluntarily during interrogation. However, a failure to report is not corruption nor solicitation. The prosecution has presented allegations, but allegations are not evidence. The prosecution fails to provide proper evidence in order to back up their charges. Officer Bob made his own decision, I cannot be held criminally responsible for an act that I neither committed nor directed. Therefore, all charges should be dismissed.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

IV. DEMANDS

• I, Donnie Siegel, request only one demand. All of the added charges upon me to be dropped.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

V. SIGNATORY

Dated: 15th of June, 2026
Respectfully submitted,

Donnie Siegel
San Andreas Police Department, Police Officer III
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Off Topic

OOC: Adding Attempted Murder as a charge being based on the damage logs is not fair and it's abuse. Only me, the suspect & Bob were inside the black market when I've fired with MP5. Miles hadn't arrived yet, so you can't dig into admin logs and paste them here as evidence while he wasn't present. He came when we exited, and witnessed only Bob's act outside. So, I don't wanna be punished because you guys take admin logs as evidence, it's not acceptable. You want to make me guilty forcefully, but it doesn't work like that. Nobody was inside to give you such info or witness what happened, even though It's all ok from my side, I haven't done anything illegal, so I am just saying, cause that's admin abuse. Same for chatlogs. What are you trying to point out? Miles has only heard the /U chat, nothing else. If he would be inside and see anything else, he would screenshot and give you anything as evidence, but no, all he managed to provide were the 2 screenshots and nothing else. Here it is Miles' fault for doing this. You've also pasted chatlogs that had nothing to do with the situation, such as:
21-05-2026 00:20:15 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Yeah, I used to have some issues with him before.

In the two sentences provided below, I was talking to an administrator related to the situation:
21-05-2026 00:27:21 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): We just killed his _Wolfe friends, and he came in scene.
21-05-2026 00:27:38 - Donnie_Siegel (38)(12160): Now he acts like innocent.
Any manager can confirm the conversation between me & the admin if needed.

Because I said ''killed'', doesn't mean I have done anything wrong and you have to charge me for it. As I said I was talking to an administrator. I really killed them, and I just expressed it that way, it does not mean corruption. Always remembering it was a suspect and he shot at us.
And the rest of the chatlogs make 0 sense, you've included chatlogs 10 mins after the sit had already ended, which are are not related to the situation. No idea what are you trying to point out with them. Talking about unprofessionalism, that is exactly what I meant. Adding charges based on admin logs, only seen it from you for the first time. I'm not saying you do not take chatlogs as evidence, but you have to be present, unlike Miles that was NOT PRESENT to witness what happened, just went through admins logs and gave it to you as evidence. That's not allowed.

[Kira Hernandez]

State of San Andreas
First Judicial District Court
United States Courthouse
3321 Downtown Avenue, Los Santos, San Andreas

---

State of San Andreas
v.
Donnie Siegel

CASE # CV-0175
HONORABLE JUDGE PRESIDING:
Kira Hernandez

The First Judicial District Court recognized this criminal case as submitted by Detective Thomas Buckley & Nan Thing on behalf of San Andreas Police Department on Sat May 30, 2026 11:58 AM.
Let it be recognized that the court has assigned this case ID # CV-0175 under presiding Judge Hon. Kira Hernandez as the Hon. Marcus Fernandes is unable to continue it.

I. FINDINGS
The evidence provided in the initial documentation provided by the state prosecution against Mr. Donnie Siegel, henceforth the Defendant, has been reviewed and has been found that such case shall be handled internally within the San Andreas Police Department's respective command & internal affairs if matter escalates. Such case may only be brought before court if the Defendant has exhausted all means within the Department to get it resolved and the results deemed unjustified, unsatisfactory. Note that if the results are valid, the case will be dismissed regardless.


II. RULING
The court finds Mr. Donnie Siegel "Not Guilty" after consulting & inquiring with the Executive Staff of the San Andreas Police Department. The case has been dismissed and handled internally.

*Bangs her Gavel*

---

Signed,
Honorable District Judge Kira Hernandez