[CV-0127] San Andreas Police Department v. State of San Andreas

[Kira Hernandez]

State of San Andreas
First Judicial District Court
United States Courthouse
3321 Downtown Avenue, Los Santos, San Andreas

---

San Andreas Police Department
v.
State of San Andreas

CASE # CV-0127
HONORABLE JUDGES PRESIDING:
Marko Vanhanen, Kira Hernandez

*Bangs her Gavel*

- The Defendant may NOT object an objection. The objection raised by the Defendant is overruled and will not be considered.
- The Plaintiff objection on relevance is sustained;

Spoiler

Are you aware of any policy that restricts SAPD officers from holding outside jobs, including private jobs?
Apart from working for the Police, prior to this law, did/do you work anywhere else?

And since there's a confusion regarding the Plaintiff's case, which has been a point break to the Defendant being overly pointed out. The Court would like to announce that it was already acknowledged, that SAPD raised concerns about private sector employment, it was provided once and for all, but their policies do not support such claims. The issue at hand is whether the SA-PSC § XI is constitutional or not, SAPD's case not being perfectly worded is not the argument in this case and it was established. Anymore arguments dragging this case further from its main issue will not be tolerated.

The Court will allow further questions for both parties on the witness about the constitutional validity of the law. The Court will disregard any misleading or contradictory statements and hold either side in contempt of Court if violated.

May the Defendant ask again or rest, disregarding the two question as quoted above. Twenty Four (24) hours each.

Signed,

Kira Hernandez
Hon. District Judge
District of San Andreas

Marko Vanhanen
Hon. District Judge
District of San Andreas

[San Andreas Governor]

Your Honor,
The witness is not capable to provide statement on constitutionality of the law. The state would not question any furthur.

Your honor, the plantiff is responsible for proving how the law is unconstitutional. Its over a month and plantiff has failed to provide any such evidence, yet the case is going onwards. The state will be happy to counter any arguments from plantiff that actually proves the law is unconstitutional.
Your honor, the state would also like to file a motion in the court and also request the court to dismiss the case as it lacks evidence.

Chuck Clayton
Governor of San Andreas

[Kira Hernandez]

State of San Andreas
First Judicial District Court
United States Courthouse
3321 Downtown Avenue, Los Santos, San Andreas

---

San Andreas Police Department
v.
State of San Andreas

CASE # CV-0127
HONORABLE JUDGES PRESIDING:
Marko Vanhanen, Kira Hernandez

Thank you Mr. Clayton but we do not make demands or requests, we are doing a cross-examination. You are in contempt of court now. Anymore irrelevant commentary and you will be escorted out of this court room. The case is continuing on the Court's discretion as established before. The motion of dismissal is denied.

May the plaintiff cross-examine or rest their case.

Signed,

Kira Hernandez
Hon. District Judge
District of San Andreas

Marko Vanhanen
Hon. District Judge
District of San Andreas

[Kacper Kowalski]

Your honour,

We have nothing further to add.

[Kira Hernandez]

State of San Andreas
First Judicial District Court
United States Courthouse
3321 Downtown Avenue, Los Santos, San Andreas

---

San Andreas Police Department
v.
State of San Andreas

CASE # CV-0127
HONORABLE JUDGES PRESIDING:
Marko Vanhanen, Kira Hernandez

The Court now will move on to the closing statements. May the Plaintiff begin theirs followed with the Defendant's. Twenty Four (24) hours each.

May the Plaintiff begin, whenever you are ready.

Signed,

Kira Hernandez
Hon. District Judge
District of San Andreas

Marko Vanhanen
Hon. District Judge
District of San Andreas

[Kacper Kowalski]

Your honour,

This case is about protecting the integrity of law enforcement. The policy isn’t about politics, it’s about ensuring officers serve without divided loyalties or conflicts of interest. Allowing officers to hold government positions creates an undeniable risk, one that oversight can only address after harm is done.

The members of the public that we serve, must trust that law enforcement remains impartial, independent, and accountable. Our policy is a safeguard, not an obstacle. Dismantling it would set a dangerous precedent, weakening the very institutions meant to protect the people.

We ask this court to uphold our policy and protect the integrity of those who serve.

Kacper Kowalski
Legal Representative for the SAPD

[San Andreas Governor]

Objection Your Honor, relevance?

The court has already stated and I quote "The issue at hand is whether the SA-PSC § XI is constitutional or not"

SAPD's internal policy is not relevant to the constitutional issue at hand.


Chuck Clayton
Governor of San Andreas

[Kira Hernandez]

State of San Andreas
First Judicial District Court
United States Courthouse
3321 Downtown Avenue, Los Santos, San Andreas

---

San Andreas Police Department
v.
State of San Andreas

CASE # CV-0127
HONORABLE JUDGES PRESIDING:
Marko Vanhanen, Kira Hernandez

*Bangs her gavel*

Mr. Clayton. You have ignored this honorable Court's procedures after several warnings, you are NOT TO object during closing statements.
The Court will allow you once to appoint a state licensed attorney only on your behalf to post a closing statement, as you have shown inability to follow the court rules and its procedures as well as refusing to adhere to what has been ordered several times. ((You are still able to post your closing statement yourself through this account using the attorney's wording and signatures, yours and his/her))


You are now held in contempt of court and fined $100,000 for violating the proceedings. Any further interruptions or violating the Court procedures and you will face an immediate removal from the courtroom without further warning.

The fine may be sent to Honorable Judge Kira Hernandez's Bank Account ((Private)) ID#696 or Government's bank ((Group)) ID#1. You have 7 days to fulfill this fine, Failure to pay within the stated timeframe will result in an automatic doubling of the fine every twenty four (24) hours past the deadline. Date starts 26/03/2025 - 21:15 CET & ends on 02/04/2025 - 21:15 CET. ((Attach a screenshot proving the transfer to this post or my Discord DMs: cardinal_k))

Signed,

Kira Hernandez
Hon. District Judge
District of San Andreas

Marko Vanhanen
Hon. District Judge
District of San Andreas

[Marcus Fernandes]

I, Marcus Fernandes will be legal counsel representing defendant and will present the closing statement.
Your Honor,

It is important to note that the Plaintiff has not provided any sufficient evidence to back their claim of the law being unconstitutional. The burden of proof lies with the Plaintiff and it is their responsiblity to prove that the law violates constitution. Since there is no relevant evidence presented, the Plaintiff's claim lacks solid foundation.

Article I, Section V of the Constitution allows state to grant additional rights to citizens and prevents dismissal of their basic rights. SA-PSC XI grants additional right to citizens in the form of multiple employment.

Given that the Plaintiff has not met the required burden of proof and has failed to provide any justifiable reasons for their assertions. There is no legal or factual basis and the claims made remain unsupported. Therefore, the defendant respectfully requests to the Court that it lifts the suspension of law in question.

Signed,