Search found 4 matches
- Fri Mar 27, 2026 11:08 am
- Forum: Archived Civil Proceedings
- Topic: Ulman_Anderson vs San Andreas Sheriff's Department
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2728
Re: Ulman_Anderson vs San Andreas Sheriff's Department
Your Honor, "Impersonation" requires a clear intent to deceive. The use of a fictional word "FederaF" is a form of protected expression. My vehicle did not display any official government seals, logos, or restricted emergency lighting. A minor spelling difference is not a technic...
- Sat Mar 21, 2026 9:35 pm
- Forum: Archived Civil Proceedings
- Topic: Ulman_Anderson vs San Andreas Sheriff's Department
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2728
Re: Ulman_Anderson vs San Andreas Sheriff's Department
[hr] Your Honor, I would like to state that my attempts to reach a settlement with the Sheriff's Department have been unsuccessful. The Department continues to hold a rigid stance, basing their entire case on a single phrase: "I am FBI." Our city, Los Santos, is built on the foundations o...
- Sun Mar 15, 2026 7:42 pm
- Forum: Archived Civil Proceedings
- Topic: Ulman_Anderson vs San Andreas Sheriff's Department
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2728
Ulman_Anderson vs San Andreas Sheriff's Department
I. OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, I am filing this formal appeal against my arrest for "Impersonating a Federal Agent." This arrest was based on a complete misunderstanding of the text on my vehicle and a lack of proper investigation by the SASD officers. The text on the rear of my vehicle ...
- Sun Feb 01, 2026 10:57 am
- Forum: Archived Criminal Proceedings
- Topic: State of San Andreas v. Ulman Anderson
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2458
Re: State of San Andreas v. Ulman Anderson
Your Honor, I would like to formally adress the accusations and the manner in which my arrest was conducted. First and foremost, I was detained solely for wearing an Army uniform.Theres no direct or indirect evidence proving that I personally wrote the " National Guard" Marking on the Mesa...
